How the rivalry between Ghana’s Nkrumah and Togo’s Olympio killed the dream of a united Africa

Ghana's first president, Kwame Nkrumah and Togo's Sylvanus Olympio

The disagreement between Nkrumah and Olympio began in the early 1950s when the Gold Coast was about to gain its independence and become Ghana.

When Ghana’s first president, Kwame Nkrumah, led the country into independence in 1957, he said that Ghana’s independence is “meaningless unless it is linked up with the total liberation of Africa”, reflecting his vision for a united Africa.

Nkrumah’s vision, which he later espoused in his book Africa Must Unite, was to have a continental government which he called “The United States of Africa” but the road to this was difficult, with Togo’s first president, Sylvanus Olympio giving him a tough time.

This created a tense relationship between the two leaders who had hitherto been working together to gain independence for their neighbouring countries.

Unifying Ghana and Togo

The disagreement between Nkrumah and Olympio began in the early 1950s when the Gold Coast was about to gain its independence and become Ghana.

How the rivalry between Ghana's Nkrumah and Togo's Olympio killed the dream of a united Africa

The Gold Coast, 1900 — Cambridge University Press

Part of the Gold Coast – Trans/Volta Togoland had once been part of Togo, which was then a German colony but after the defeat of Germany in the First World War, Togo was divided into two by the League of Nations.

One part was given to France as a separate colony and the other to Britain to administer  under a League of Nations ‘mandate’,

The British refused to administer Togoland as a separate territory and rather attached Trans/Volta to its old colony, the Gold Coast.

“The British didn’t, of course, bother to ask the inhabitants of the two territories that were to be brought together in a ‘shotgun’ wedding, what their own views of the British plan were. Had the British bothered to ask, they would no doubt have been told that the plan was a diabolical one. For it would segregate forcibly behind separate borders, ethnic groups that had traditionally lived as single entities before the European colonisers came.

The Ewe people, in particular, were deeply resentful of this division that was imposed on them, which separated many families from one another and thus placed tremendous social hardships on them,” according to Martin Cameron Duodu, a United Kingdom-based Ghanaian novelist, journalist and editor.

In the mid-1950s, as Gold Coast set to become the independent nation of Ghana, questions were now being raised as to what would become of the Trans/Volta ‘appendage’ of the Gold Coast; whether it should be allowed to achieve independence with the Gold Coast, or to secede and unite, instead, with the territory of which it had once formed part now called ‘French Togoland’ which was also on its way towards independence under the name Togo.

How the rivalry between Ghana's Nkrumah and Togo's Olympio killed the dream of a united Africa

Kwame Nkrumah — TRUE Africa

Nkrumah and other politicians wanted Trans/Volta to stay with the Gold Coast and become part of Ghana but Ewe politicians in French Togoland, including Olympio, as well as their allies in the Gold Coast, wanted otherwise.

After a referendum was held in 1956, the majority of the people of Trans/Volta Togoland decided to stay in Ghana, angering Olympio and his Ewe allies in Ghana.

How the rivalry between Ghana's Nkrumah and Togo's Olympio killed the dream of a united Africa

Togoland Congress Rally in Ho, 1956 — Cambridge University Press

Thus, when fast forward, Nkrumah, as president, wanted to integrate Togo into Ghana, Olympio (then Togo’s president) disagreed and preferred that Togo remained independent with concerns that by being integrated into Ghana, the Togolese people risked being dominated by Ghana.

How the rivalry between Ghana's Nkrumah and Togo's Olympio killed the dream of a united Africa

Sylvanus Olympio — African Success

The British and French rule had ended and Olympio believed that this made collaboration between Ghana and Togo easier as he had plans to unify the Ewe people who had largely been split between Ghana and Togo, but he did not think that one country should be integrated into the other as Nkrumah believed.

Nkrumah had essentially wanted for the remaining portion of the former German Togoland to be merged into Ghana as well as part of his vision of unifying Africa, believing that if Africa did not unite as quickly as possible the newly independent African nations may come under threat of being conquered once again by colonial forces.

But his dream became a tough one, considering colonialism had taught Africans to feel distinct.

“After independence, the French did not have to exert themselves to keep Togo and Ghana from getting together. The work had been done already. The elite had become more French than the Frenchmen themselves…” according to T. Ras Makonnen, a Guyanese born Pan-Africanist who worked in Nkrumah’s government.

How the rivalry between Ghana's Nkrumah and Togo's Olympio killed the dream of a united Africa

Kwame Nkrumah

Nkrumah clashed with several other political leaders like Julius Nyerere of Tanzania who believed that Nkrumah’s idea of an immediate unified Africa was unrealistic. They believed that a gradual approach to unity was ideal.

After 1961, the relationship between Nkrumah and Olympio got so tense to the extent that Ghana was openly welcoming Olympio’s political critics, while opponents of Nkrumah’s regime were being welcomed in Togo.

There were reports of multiple assassination attempts against each leader, thus, when Olympio was assassinated in a military coup in 1963 and his government overthrown, many political observers concluded that Nkrumah was behind the coup.

How the rivalry between Ghana's Nkrumah and Togo's Olympio killed the dream of a united Africa

Sylvanus Olympio

Nkrumah’s government was also toppled three years later, with many later arguing that the coups in both countries may have been avoided had Nkrumah and Olympio been able to understand and cooperate with each other more fully than they did.

Last Edited by:Victor Ativie Updated: May 11, 2020

Conversations

Must Read

Connect with us

Join our Mailing List to Receive Updates